Klopp je pojačao Lovrenu konkurenciju, ali navijači nisu nimalo zadovoljni
Pogođen ozljedama Škrtela, Lovrena i Sakhoa Liverpool je morao dovesti braniča
A što je s Nevenom Subotićem?. Reakcija je to navijača Liverpoola na vijest da je na posudbu do kraja sezone klub doveo braniča niželigaša QPR-a Stevena Caulkera (24).
Naime, pogođen ozljedama Martina Škrtela, Dejana Lovrena i Mamadoua Sakhoa, trener Jurgen Klopp najavio je da će morati dovesti pojačanje u sredini obrane, a očito su navijači mislili da bi mogao između ostalog pogledati prema svlačionici bivšeg kluba. A sada su ostali razočarani.
https://twitter.com/LFCVine/status/686903206358691840
Debi s Arsenalom
Liverpool u srijedu igra derbi s Arsenalom i lako je moguće da već tada upiše debi. Caulker je, inače, od 2009-2013 bio član Tottenhama, ali je za njih odigrao samo 18 utakmica. Vrijeme je većinom provodio po posudbama a onda je prešao u Cardiff City, te 2014. u QPR.
#LFC have completed the signing of Steven Caulker on loan from Queens Park Rangers until the end of the season. pic.twitter.com/jacWOhBsMN
— Liverpool FC (at 🏠) (@LFC) January 12, 2016
Prvi dio ove sezone proveo je na posudbi u Suthamptonu, a nastupio je u samo tri prvenstvene utakmice. Caulker je prošlog mjeseca zaigrao u Liga kupu protiv Liverpoola, a obrana čije je bio član primila je šest golova.
Lots of hate and fume but it’s a loan deal for Caulker.#LFC play twice week for the next month or so. Bodies required – especially at CB.
— AnfieldIndex (@AnfieldIndex) January 12, 2016
Klopp final say ???? where the hell has he seen caulker play ?#LFC #Liverpool
— Gary Goodspeed Esque (@LamoTloubatla) January 12, 2016
Can't pretend to be pleased Caulker has signed Klopp or not
— LFC Repeat (@LfcRepeat) January 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/Samirak93/status/686902761066086400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Caulker must have impressed Klopp – his last game for Southampton was 6-1 thrashing in League Cup….
— Ed Aarons (@ed_aarons) January 12, 2016
Most people will defend the signing because it's Klopp, but Caulker is awful.
— joel (@jbrookes7) January 12, 2016
Having to settle for Caulker in stead of Subotic, is like when Harry Potter gave up on Cho Chang and got on with Ginny.
— DEEP DASTARDLY (@srijandeep) January 12, 2016
I need to get Steven Caulker's agent to represent me
— Ian Abrahams (Moose) (@BroadcastMoose) January 12, 2016
Can we see how he does in Red before writing him off completely when a ball hasn’t been kicked? Surely right thing to do? No sense on here.
— GaGs* (@GagsTandon) January 12, 2016
Given how often JK said he didn't want to sign anyone in Jan, a loan move for an uninjured player purely to get thru a crisis is fine by me
— Dan Kennett (@DanKennett) January 12, 2016
Caulker technically came from Southampton…
THE SPIRIT OF RODGERS LIVES ON.
— Footy Accumulators (@FootyAccums) January 12, 2016
Caulker to Liverpool is such a Brendan Rodgers type signing
— ReviewFootball (@ReviewFootball) January 12, 2016
Caulker?? Typical Rodgers signing always going for the "PROVEN" Premier League talent. Howedes is available for £69m and we didn't get him??
— Si (@PhantomGoal) January 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/TheCarteI/status/686903189350780929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw